What is the global perspective on cryptocurrency oversight and the evolving legal framework shaping the future of digital currencies? Read more here.
How can you regulate an asset that was created to be unregulated? Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have existed for almost a decade, but efforts to control and legalize them have only recently picked up momentum. The crypto ecosystem is dynamic and challenging to track in a global setting due to the sheer number of participants. Let’s look at some regulatory and legal concerns that must be addressed.
How Do We Classify Bitcoin?
Source: Freepik, via Freepik
Thanks to the rapid rate of adoption and the growth in market capitalization of Bitcoin and crypto assets, applying current regulatory frameworks to crypto assets or building new ones is tricky. The challenge of legally categorizing crypto assets arises from their basis as cryptographic code. If you trade crypto, the pressing question becomes: How should these digital assets be defined: is it property, security, money, or something else?
There is no agreement on the matter, and the precise classification of this asset depends on the applicable jurisdiction and the parties’ agreement to determine how Bitcoin is regulated.
Furthermore, various cryptocurrencies may be classed differently, raising concerns regarding regulatory authority, as noted by the chairman of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, which may distinguish Bitcoin from other cryptos.
Tracing and Recovering Assets May Be Difficult
Given that crypto assets’ anonymity is a defining trait, tracking them down may need the expertise and services of blockchain analytics firms. When firms keep their funds at private addresses, or “cold wallets,” instead of exchange-controlled accounts, “hot wallets,” this might be even more difficult. Cold wallets offer the highest level of decentralized security for Bitcoin users. In the absence of the owner’s private key, they are almost unbreakable. This anonymity function may be necessary in protecting people’s financial privacy, especially the most vulnerable among us. Even if regulatory authorities discover the location of a cold wallet and it can be physically confiscated, retrieving the funds from such a wallet without the owner’s participation would be exceedingly complex. For example, this happened in Quadriga’s insolvency case and the associated death of the exchange’s CEO, Gerald Cotton, who possessed a cold wallet containing the assumed company’s money, which consequently vanished.
Balancing Access and Regulatory Oversight
Source: Freepik, via Freepik
Centralized exchanges, like Binance, play a vital role in the crypto industry. With centralized exchanges, dramatic increases in market capitalization and acceptance were possible. However, multi-purpose centralized exchanges present hazards that authorities must address. Many exchanges need to provide more information to investors about their operations, finances, or governance, and customers’ funds may be misappropriated via centralized exchanges.
Centralized exchanges are often subject to either nonexistent or less strict rules, which starkly contrasts the traditional financial sector. Specific laws that separate consumer funds from proprietary trading were enacted as part of the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-assets framework, which became legislation recently.
Some international trade may occur outside of the jurisdiction of a single country. As the United States saw with FTX, this renders politicians incapable of even the most fundamental monitoring forms. Cryptocurrency firms outside existing regulatory categories, whether on purpose or not, continue to baffle policy makers worldwide, who have yet to reach a unified front. One of the biggest obstacles is bringing crypto activity within the regulatory boundaries.
High Rate of Illegal Activities
Legislators also have difficulty using crypto assets for illicit purposes like financing terrorists, evading taxes, or buying political influence. Cryptocurrency is a preferred payment method for criminals because it offers anonymity, is accessible anywhere in the world, requires little space for storage, and is notoriously challenging for law authorities to obtain.
Additionally, no central body or authority has the final say over these matters and exclusive competence to resolve disputes.
Bitcoin transactions rely on the confidence of the network’s peers and the blockchain technology behind them. However, this danger increases due to the lack of even the most fundamental consumer protection regulations.
Refunds, for instance, are not guaranteed in a disagreement between a store and a consumer. In the event of a breach, the victim may be unable to collect damages due to insufficient legal proof.
Also, victims of scams are uninformed about the legal remedies open to them. Due to the perpetrator’s anonymity, identifying information such as their location may be elusive.
Other critical legal issues include data breaches and financial fraud. Data theft and financial crime perpetrated using crypto assets may be beyond the reach of current data regulations.
Does Bitcoin Need Regulations?
Source: fanjianhua, via Freepik
Satoshi Nakamoto created Bitcoin with a system of built-in checks and balances. It uses miners to verify trades before adding them to a public database. Any Bitcoin transaction approved by miners and added to the blockchain cannot be undone. Thus, no entity can tamper with the digital records in Bitcoin’s blockchain.
The regulatory landscape for Bitcoin can generally be categorized into four distinct types: taxation, anti-money laundering (AML) measures, consumer protection standards, and licensing requirements. While most users may concede to the necessity of consumer protection, AML safeguards, and a licensing system, implementing such regulations presents a significant challenge.
The inherently decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin poses a fundamental question: How can effective regulation be achieved without compromising the principles of decentralization, preserving consumer privacy, and avoiding the consolidation of the crypto industry into a single, regulated entity when it is a development likely to be met with resistance from the user community?
Bitcoin’s digital nature, lower fees, convenience, and decentralization have made it a popular choice for money transfer, among other financial endeavors. This digital currency allows users to instantly send and receive money, regardless of location. It’s helped people gain more independence in their money. Individuals who don’t have bank accounts can nonetheless receive and save money. This demonstrates the need for legislation allowing people living in rural regions without access to banking services to receive funds from donors in other parts of the world without incurring excessive fees or waiting periods.
How Can Legislators Tackle These Issues?
Legislators can tackle these issues in several ways, including establishing a transparent regulatory and taxing structure without increasing transaction fees and eliminating decentralization. Doing so will provide greater market legitimacy and order, create trust in consumers, and even increase adoption. To secure the safety of investors and other stakeholders in the crypto ecosystem and to allow for further innovation, it is also crucial that the underlying legal and regulatory challenges be resolved as quickly as possible.